User Experience Is All There Is

Author:

Hassenzahl Marc1ORCID,Burmester Michael2,Koller Franz3

Affiliation:

1. Universität Siegen , Siegen , Germany

2. 120207 Hochschule der Medien , Stuttgart , Germany

3. User Interface Design , Ludwigsburg , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Twenty years ago, we published an article in the first issue of the i-com entitled “Usability ist nicht alles” (Burmester et al., 2002), that is, “Usability isn’t everything”. This was certainly a provocative title. For most German researchers and practitioners of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) usability was all there is and all that was ever needed to guarantee humane technology. Back then, we profoundly disagreed. We were convinced that there is more to the quality of interactive technology than mere effectiveness and efficiency. Now, twenty years later it seems safe to say that we had a point. Let’s take this as an opportunity to take a brief and utterly anecdotal look back, to take stock of the current perspective on designing the (user) experience, as well as to discuss some future opportunities and challenges.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Communication,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Information Systems,Social Psychology

Reference77 articles.

1. Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Hornbæk, K. (2011). Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2689–2698). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1979336.

2. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. Jordan & B. Thomas (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.

3. Brooke, J., Bevan, N., Brigham, F., Harker, S., & Youmans, D. (1990). Usability Statements and Standardisation: Work in Progress in ISO. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Third Interational Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 357–361).

4. Burmester, M. (2013). Valenzmethode – Formative Evaluation der User Experience. In K. Scherfer & H. Volpers (Eds.), Methoden der Webwissenschaft – Ein Handbuch. Bd. I Anwendungsbezogene Methoden (Vol. 11, pp. 141–160). LIT Verlag.

5. Burmester, M., Hassenzahl, M., & Koller, F. (2002). Usability ist nicht alles – Wege zu attraktiven Produkten. I-Com, 1, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1524/icom.2002.1.1.032.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3