Say what you want, I’m not listening!
Author:
González Adriana Lorena1, Geiskkovitch Denise Y.2, Young James E.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Computer Science , University of Manitoba , Winnipeg , Canada 2. Department of Computing and Software , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada
Abstract
Abstract
We present a conversational social robot behaviour design that draws from psychotherapy research to support individual self-reflection and wellbeing, without requiring the robot to parse or otherwise understand what the user is saying. This simplicity focused approached enabled us to intersect the well-being aims with privacy and simplicity, while achieving high robustness. We implemented a fully autonomous and standalone (not network enabled) prototype and conducted a proof-of-concept study as an initial step to test the feasibility of our behaviour design: whether people would successfully engage with our simple behaviour and could interact meaningfully with it. We deployed our robot unsupervised for 48 h into the homes of 14 participants. All participants engaged with self-reflection with the robot without reporting any interaction challenges or technical issues. This supports the feasibility of our specific behaviour design, as well as the general viability of our non-parsing simplicity approach to conversation, which we believe to be an exciting avenue for further exploration. Our results thus pave the way for further exploring how conversational behaviour designs like ours may support people living with loneliness.
Funder
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Communication,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Information Systems,Social Psychology
Reference68 articles.
1. Young, J. E., Sung, J., Voida, A., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T., Christensen, H. I., Grinter, R. E. Evaluating human-robot interaction: focusing on the holistic interaction experience. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2011, 3, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0081-8. 2. Banks, M. R., Willoughby, L. M., Banks, W. A. Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2008, 9, 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.007. 3. Aminuddin, R., Sharkey, A., Levita, L. Interaction with the Paro robot may reduce psychophysiological stress responses. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2016; pp. 593–594. 4. Björling, E. A., Rose, E., Davidson, A., Ren, R., Wong, D. Can we keep him forever? Teens’ engagement and desire for emotional connection with a social robot. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2020, 12, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00539-6. 5. Feil-Seifer, D., Matarić, M. J. Defining socially assistive robotics. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005, 2005; pp. 465–468.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|