Product Differentiation in a Vertical Structure

Author:

Han Tien-Der1,Haque M. Emranul2,Mukherjee Arijit3456ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Loughborough University , Loughborough , UK

2. Department of Economics , The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK

3. Nottingham University Business School , Nottingham , UK

4. CESifo , Munich , Germany

5. INFER , Cologne , Germany

6. GRU, City University of Hong Kong , Kowloon Tong , Hong Kong

Abstract

Abstract We consider final goods producers’ preference for horizontal product differentiation in the presence of strategic input price determination. Final goods producers may not prefer maximal differentiation but may prefer moderate differentiation under both Cournot and Bertrand competition in the final goods market if product differentiation does not increase the market size significantly and there is either free entry in the input market or the input supplier has increasing returns to scale technology. Thus, we provide a new rationale for moderate product differentiation. Our reasons are different from the existing reasons of mixed pricing strategy, endogenous leadership, no-buy option for the consumers and the relative performance incentive schemes.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference56 articles.

1. Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, and P. Howitt. 2005. “Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U-Relationship.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120: 701–28, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/120.2.701.

2. Ardelean, A. 2006. How Strong is the Love of Variety. Mimeo: Purdue University.

3. Besanko, D., D. Dranove, M. Shanley, and S. Schaefer. 2013. Economics of Strategy, 6th ed. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.

4. Bowley, A. L. 1924. The Mathematical Groundwork of Economics: An Introductory Treatise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

5. Brekke, K. R., and O. R. Straume. 2004. “Bilateral Monopolies and Location Choice.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 34: 275–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-0462(03)00046-2.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3