Affiliation:
1. University of Vienna , Department of Linguistics , Sensengasse 3 a, 1090 Vienna , Austria Austria 27258 University of Vienna
Abstract
Abstract
This contribution deals with the use of playback interviews in interactional sociolinguistics, a method wherein participants review audio or video recordings of their conversations and provide retrospective commentary. I first outline a brief history of the development of the playback method and how it was incorporated into the interactional sociolinguistic research agenda. As theoretical frameworks for playback interviews and their application to research on language ideologies remain underexplored, this article introduces three concepts from linguistic anthropology—citationality, reflexivity, and interdiscursivity—to theorize playback interviews from a semiotic perspective. Departing from these theories, playback interviews are contextualized within broader social dynamics, including participation frames, power, and rapport that are inherent in the interviewing process. Drawing on source recordings from interactions between L1 and European L2 users of Japanese in Tokyo, and playback sessions with the L2 users, I illustrate how playback interviews contribute to language-ideological inquiries, for example, perceptions of style and code-switching. The analysis showcases the method’s potential to unveil participants’ metapragmatic awareness and explore the intersection of linguistic structure, practice, and ideology. Playback interviews are positioned as a valuable tool for investigating language ideologies, offering new methodological perspectives through retrospection and reflection on communication.
Reference51 articles.
1. Adachi, Chie. 2016. Sugoi! – Indexicality and stancetaking in Japanese compliments. Language in Society 45(2). 193–216.
2. Briggs, Charles L. 1986. Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Coupland, Nikolas & Adam Jaworski. 2004. Sociolinguistic perspectives on metalanguage: Reflexivity, evaluation, ideology. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasiński (eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives (Language, Power and Social Process 11), 15–51. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
4. Deppermann, Arnulf. 2013. Interview als Text vs. Interview als Interaktion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14(3). [61 paragraphs].
5. Erickson, Frederick & Jeffrey Shultz. 1982. The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews (Language, Thought, and Culture). New York: Academic Press.