Sharing interview questions in advance: Methodological considerations in applied linguistics research

Author:

Haukås Åsta1,Tishakov Therese2

Affiliation:

1. University of Bergen , Department of foreign languages , 5020 Bergen , Norway Norway 1658 University of Bergen

2. OsloMet – storbyuniversitetet , Oslo , Akershus, Norway Norway 60499 OsloMet – storbyuniversitetet

Abstract

Abstract Interviews serve as a prominent methodological tool in applied linguistics and beyond, allowing researchers to explore participants’ experiences, ideologies and beliefs. Yet, the extent to which interview questions are shared in advance with participants is often unclear, although this methodological decision can substantially shape responses and subsequent reflections. Some advantages of sharing interview questions in advance include enhanced participant engagement and reflexivity, reduced interview anxiety, and more thoughtful responses. Conversely, the practice may engender risks such as participant bias, and predetermined answers. This reflective piece addresses this underexplored aspect by first discussing methodological considerations of such a practice, including a brief review of existing practices in research on language teacher ideologies and beliefs. Second, it considers ethical dimensions entailed in such a practice. Additionally, this paper explores how six English teachers in Norway experienced having access to all interview questions in advance to prepare for interviews centred around their individual teaching beliefs about multilingualism and multilingual practices. The paper concludes by suggesting that sharing interview questions in advance can benefit both participants and enhance the quality of research.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference31 articles.

1. Borg, Simon. 2006. Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. London: Bloomsbury.

2. Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.

3. Brinkmann, Svend & Steinar Kvale. 2005. Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of constructivist psychology 18(2). 157–181. doi.org/10.1080/10720530590914789

4. Brinkmann, Svend & Steinar Kvale. 2015. InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 3rd edn. London: Sage.

5. Burton, Jill. 2009. Reflective practice. In Anne Bruns & Jack C. Richards (eds.), Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 298–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781139042710

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3