Affiliation:
1. Grinnell College Grinnell United States of America
Abstract
Abstract
This article considers the distinct lack of bodies and embodiment throughout Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde. While it seems to be a war-time erotic romance in which the plot hinges on the physical threats and pleasures available to its characters, through its many contradictions and deceptions, the poem makes the bodies of Troilus, Criseyde, and Pandarus unknowable, even at their most crucial moments. It is through the frustration of bodily hermeneutics in Troilus and Criseyde that Chaucer signals his rejection of the romance genre and the beginning of an anti-Boethian turn that becomes the governing theme of the first fragment of the Canterbury Tales.
Reference42 articles.
1. Battles, Dominque. 2004. The Medieval Tradition of Thebes: History and Narrative in the “Roman de Thebes”, Boccaccio, Chaucer, and Lydgate. New York: Routledge.
2. Carmichael, Ann G. 2008. “Universal and Particular: The Language of Plague, 1348–1500”. In: Vivian Nutton (ed.). Pestilential Complexities: Understanding Medieval Plague. London: Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL. 17–52.
3. Chace, Jessica. 2021. “‘Semy-vif for sorow’: Disability and Tragedy in Troilus and Criseyde and the Tale of Beryn”. Chaucer Review 56: 54–78.
4. Cohen, Esther. 2010. The Modulated Scream: Pain in Late Medieval Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Crocker, Holly A. and Tison Pugh. 2008. “Masochism, Masculinity, and the Pleasures of Troilus”. In: Pugh and Marzec, 82–92.