Affiliation:
1. Korea Institute of Public Finance , Sejong , Korea
2. Department of Economics , Myongji University , Seodaemun-gu 03674 , K orea
Abstract
Abstract
This paper evaluated how the tax penalty, corporate income feedback tax (CIFT), on retained earnings affected firms’ managerial decisions in South Korea. We focused on how the firms allocated the retained earnings to minimize the additional tax liability. We employed a quasi-natural experiment design resulting from the enactment of the CIFT in 2015 to identify how the tax penalty on earning retention affected investment, dividend, and employment. We took advantage of the eligibility condition of the CIFT to construct a quasi-natural experimental design. Our estimation results show that most firms subject to the CIFT paid out dividends to equity holders to avoid additional tax liabilities despite of modest increase of investment. They did not change wages much. Rather, they decreased wage payment. In sum, the CIFT was not as successful as Korean government wished.
Subject
Law,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference62 articles.
1. Alstadsæter, A., M. Jacob, and R. Michaely. 2017. “Do Dividend Taxes Affect Corporate Investment?” Journal of Public Economics 151: 74–83.
2. Arulampalam, W., M.P. Devereux, and G. Manffini. 2012. “The direct incidence of corporate income tax on wages.” European Economic Review 56 (6): 1038–54.
3. Baumol, W. J. 1952. “The Transactions Demand for Money: an Inventory Theoretic Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 66: 545–56.
4. Bernanke, B.S. 2005. “The Global Saving Glut and the US Current Account Deficit.” WP. 77. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
5. Binh, K. B., and E. S. Seo. 2014. “An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Precautionary Cash Holding of Corporate Sector on the Recession.” Korean Journal of Financial Management 31 (1): 173–214.