The Norms on Cross-Border Data Flows in the RCEP

Author:

Huang Gui1,Lei Yin1

Affiliation:

1. Law School, Yunnan University , Kunming , China

Abstract

Abstract Cross-border data flows is a crucial factor in digital economy. Article 12.14 (2) and Article 12.15 (2) in RCEP stipulate the prohibitive norms on data localization, aiming to ensure the data is transferred freely. Except some other clauses indirectly stipulate some circumstances for excluding the use of the prohibitive norms, Article 12.14 (3) and Article 12.15 (3) directly stipulate the exception clauses of data localization, i.e., the clause of legitimate public policy, horizontal provisions, and clause of the essential security interests. The WTO case-laws show that the aforesaid concepts should be interpreted by the Parties according to their own reality. The norms on “anti-discrimination” and “anti-disguised restriction” are to prevent the “clause of legitimate public policy” from being abused. To understand these norms, we need to evaluate the substantive purposes of the concrete measures launched by the states, and then clarify the relations between aforesaid purposes and the legitimate public policy objective.

Funder

Innovation Plan of the Fundamental Researches of the Social Science at the Yunnan University

Open Foundation of Engineering Research Center of Cyberspace

Project for the Development of Rule of Law in Yunnan

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference44 articles.

1. Ajibo, C. C., S. I. Nwatu, F. O. Ukwueze, E. Adibe, C. Lloyd, and N. U. Richards. 2019. “RCEP, CPTPP and the Changing Dynamics in International Trade Standard-Setting.” Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 16 (3): 425–40.

2. Alford, R. P. 2011. “The Self-Judging WTO Security Exception.” Utah Law Review 2011: 697–759.

3. Benton Heath, J. 2020. “The New National Security Challenge to the Economic Order.” The Yale Law Journal 129 (4): 1020–99.

4. Bossche, P. V. D. 2016. Essentials of WTO Law, 104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Burke-White, W., and A. v. Staden. 2009. “Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties.” Virginia Journal of International Law 48 (2): 307–410.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Validating India’s Withdrawal from RCEP and Its Regional Future;Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy;2024-04-03

2. Cyberspace as a fifth dimension of national security: trade measure exceptions;Journal of International Trade Law and Policy;2023-06-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3