Affiliation:
1. Hezardastan Group , Tehran , Iran
Abstract
Abstract
Competition is building block of any successful economy, while a cartelized economy is against the common good of society. Nowadays, developing artificial intelligence (AI) and its plausibility to foster cartels persuade governments to revitalize their interference in the market and implement new regulations to tackle AI implications. In this sense, as pooling of technologies might enable cartels to impose high prices and violate consumers’ rights, it should be restricted. By contrast, in the libertarian approach, cartels’ impacts are defined by government interference in the market. Accordingly, it is irrational to rely on a monopolized power called government to equilibrate a cartelized market. This article discusses that AI is a part of the market process that should be respected, and a restrictive or protective approach such as the U.S. government Executive Order 13859 is not in line with libertarian thought and can be a ladder to escalate the cartelistic behaviors.
Subject
Law,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference99 articles.
1. Abrardi, L., C. Cambini, and L. Rondi. 2019. “The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: A Survey.” EUI Working 1–34. Paper RSCAS 2019/58.
2. Armentano, D. 2001. Antitrust the Case for Repeal. Washington D.C.: Cato Institute.
3. Azzutti, A., W. G. Ringe, and H. S. Stiehl. 2021. Machine Learning, Market Manipulation and Collusion on Capital Markets: Why the ’Black Box’ Matters. Working Paper Series, European Banking Institute.
4. Bastiat, F. 2007. The Bastiat Collection. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
5. Beneke, F., and M. O. Mackenrodt. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence and Collusion.” IIC 50: 109–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-018-00773-x.