Estimation of hematocrit in filter paper dried bloodspots by potassium measurement: advantage of use of perimeter ring samples over circular center sub-punch samples

Author:

Rufail Miguel L.,McCloskey Laura J.,Stickle Douglas F.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Quantitative assays using dried filter paper bloodspots (DBS) may be adversely affected by hematocrit (HCT) as an unknown variable. Studies have demonstrated the utility of the measurement of potassium (K) from DBS punches to estimate HCT. Because there is significant accrual of RBCs at the DBS perimeter, we investigated whether K measurement from ring-shaped specimens inclusive of the perimeter might provide an advantage over conventional interior circular sub-punch samples to estimate HCT. Methods: Primary samples were Li-heparin whole blood, with HCT as measured on concurrently-drawn K-EDTA specimens. DBS were formed by bolus addition of 40 μL whole blood to filter paper cards. Total bloodspot area was determined by image analysis. Removal of center sub-punch (P) samples of fixed area produced remainder ring (R) samples inclusive of the perimeter. Samples were extracted in K-EDTA (2.5 mmol/L) and measured for diluent-corrected K per area (α, μmol K/cm2). Results: Forty-three patient samples were utilized. α was normally distributed: α(P)=1.23±0.26 μmol K/cm2; α(R)=1.86±0.41 μmol K/cm2; α(R)/α(P)=1.51±0.15. α was correlated with HCT: α(P)=0.030 HCT(%)+0.015 μmol K/cm2 (r2=0.795); α(R)=0.052 HCT(%)+0.010 μmol K/cm2 (r2 = 0.912), but with higher resolution and lesser error for α(R). Conclusions: K per area (α) was significantly higher in R samples vs. P samples, with higher resolution for α(R) vs. HCT. Use of ring samples inclusive of the perimeter to estimate HCT for DBS via K measurement can provide an advantage over use of center sub-punch samples.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3