Economic evaluation of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy in acute respiratory infections: a Chinese hospital system perspective

Abstract

AbstractBackground:Cost-impact models have indicated that in the USA, the use of antibiotic stewardship protocols based on procalcitonin (PCT) levels for patients with suspected acute respiratory tract infection results in cost savings. Our objective was to assess the cost impact of adopting PCT testing among patients with acute respiratory infections (ARI) from the perspective of a typical hospital system in urban China.Methods:To conduct an economic evaluation of PCT testing versus usual care we built a cost-impact model based on a previously published patient-level meta-analysis data of randomized trials including Chinese sites. The data were adapted to the China setting by applying the results to mean lengths of stay, costs, and practice patterns typically found in China. We estimated the annual ARI visit rate for the typical hospital system (assumed to be 1650 beds) and ARI diagnosis.Results:In the inpatient setting, the costs of PCT-guided care compared to usual care for a cohort of 16,405 confirmed ARI patients was almost 1.1 million Chinese yuan (CNY), compared to almost 1.8 million CNY for usual care, resulting in net savings of 721,563 CNY to a typical urban Chinese hospital system for 2015. In the ICU and outpatient settings, savings were 250,699 CNY and 2.4 million CNY, respectively. The overall annual net savings of PCT-guided care was nearly 3.4 million CNY.Conclusions:Substantial savings are associated with PCT protocols of ARI across common China hospital treatment settings mainly by direct reduction in unnecessary antibiotic utilization.