Affiliation:
1. National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital of the Ministry of Health , Beijing , P.R. China
Abstract
Abstract
Background: A national cross-sectional survey on the reporting of critical values was conducted to provide suggestions on monitoring of the quality indicator and obtain the goal of quality improvement.
Methods: All clinical laboratories participating in the external quality assessment (EQA) programs of chemistry, blood gas, and hematology tests organized by the National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL) were enrolled in our study. General information on the policy of critical values reporting and the particular problems about critical limits and practice of critical values reporting in the last 2 months were asked in the questionnaire. All collected data were analyzed by the special statistical software designed by the NCCL.
Results: The return rate of surveys for critical values on clinical biochemistry, blood gas, and hematology testing were 46.11%, 41.14%, and 39.42%, respectively. Most laboratories in the surveys suggested they set different critical limits for children and adults. The analytes of critical values chosen most frequently were potassium, glucose, sodium, calcium, pH, pCO2, pO2, white blood cell (WBC) count, hemoglobin (Hb), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time, and fibrinogen. The analytes with most critical values were potassium, blood gas, and creatinine for clinical biochemistry, pCO2 for blood gas, and WBC, Hb, and PT for hematology testing. The medians of critical limits for potassium, sodium, calcium, and glucose were not significantly different from the results of the national survey conducted by Kost in 1990.
Conclusions: Remarkable inter-laboratory difference in the development and implementation of critical values reporting procedure were found. Laboratories should communicate with clinicians to obtain consensus on the analytes and limits of critical values.
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Reference16 articles.
1. Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values. MLO Med Lab Obs 1972;4:47–54.
2. Kost GJ. Critical limits for urgent clinician notification at US medical centers. J Am Med Assoc 1990;263:704–7.
3. Available from:http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/NPSG_Chapter_Jan2013_HAP.pdf.
4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services. Part 493. Laboratory requirements: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of l988 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 42. Parts 430 to end. US Government Printing Office, published annually.
5. ISO. Medical laboratories: particular requirements for quality and competence. ISO 15189. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2007.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献