Abstract
Abstract
The Bayh–Dole Act was enacted in the United States in 1980 to promote economic development and growth at regional and national levels. A key engine is research generated within universities. This article addresses the question of how universities can serve as engines of development. Drawing on Cooter and Shaeffer’s work on law and development, specifically what they call the double trust problem, this article shows how the Bayh–Dole Act was justified as resolving the double trust problem arising from lack of property rights in university research. This article presents the argument that this goal of the Bayh–Dole Act ignores how universities solve another dimension of the double trust problem, namely the generation of human capital. The author examines the theoretical justifications for the Bayh–Dole Act and universities and the empirical policy literature assessing university patenting and commercialization in the United States, South Africa, and India.
Subject
Law,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Development
Reference23 articles.
1. Brown, Christopher. “Ayresian Technology, Schumpeterian Innovation, and the Bayh–Dole Act.” 43 Journal of Economic Issues, no. 2 (2009).
2. Cooter, Robert D., and Hans-Bernd Schaefer. Solomon’s Knot: How Law Can End the Poverty of Nations (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 2012).
3. Dai, Yixin, David Popp, and Stuart Bretschneider. Institutions and Intellectual Property: The Influence of Institutional Forces on University Patenting, 24 Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, no. 3 (2005).
4. Geary, William L., Protecting the Patent Rights of Small Businesses: Does the Bayh–Dole Act Live Up to Its Promise?, 22 Public Contract Law Journal, no. 1 (1992).
5. Ghosh, Shubha, “Bayh–Dole beyond Patents,” in Jacob Rooksby (ed.) Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing 2020).