Affiliation:
1. University of Oslo Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies Postboks 1102, Blindern, 0317 Oslo Norway
Abstract
Abstract
Inflection classes that have many members often gain members from classes that have fewer. While this tendency is often pointed out in diachronic linguistics, the American psycholinguist Charles Yang (2016) goes further. He claims this to be always the case, so that minority classes cannot be productive at the expense of majority classes, and that productivity actually can be predicted. By this view, productivity is a direct function of type frequency; there are no other factors determining whether a pattern is productive.
The claim of this paper is that type frequency is not the only factor determining productivity, and that while Yang’s approach, the ›Tolerance Principle‹, is interesting, it cannot be upheld in its present form. The paper presents an example of suppletion spreading in Germanic, and it presents examples of minority patterns spreading in North Germanic. Parallels outside of Germanic are pointed out. Also, it is argued that Yang’s (2016) analysis of English verb inflection and German noun inflection is insufficient, so these important case-studies, presented in favour of the Tolerance Principle, do not support it.
In general, the paper emphasises the importance of ›local generalisations‹ and of seeing language as a ›system‹ of low-level regularities, not all-encompassing rules. While type frequency certainly seems important for productivity, inflectional morphology is a complex matter; productivity is also influenced by various factors of a more structural nature.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference73 articles.
1. Ackerman, Farrell and Robert Malouf 2013: Morphological organization: the low conditional entropy conjecture, in: Language 89, p. 429–465.
2. – 2014: The No Blur Principle Effects as an Emergent Property of Language Systems, in: Hanna Jurgensen [et al.] (eds.): BLS 41, p. 1–14.
3. Ambridge, Ben 2020a: Against stored abstractions. A radical exemplar model of language acquisition, in: First Language Acquisition 40, p. 509–559.
4. – 2020b: Abstractions made of exemplars, or ›You’re all right, and I’ve changed my mind‹: Response to commentators, in: First Language Acquisition 40, p. 640–659.
5. Andersen, Henning 1973: Abductive and deductive change, in: Language 49, p. 765–793.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A User’s Defense of the Tolerance Principle: Reply to Enger (2022);Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur;2023-11-23