Affiliation:
1. University of Illinois , United States of America
Abstract
Abstract
Scholars have debated whether the sentiment of sixteenth century reformers against material forms of worship derived from certain Neo-Platonic ideas proliferating in parts of Europe and disseminated by Erasmus or from strictly Scriptural principles that were initially formulated by the Old Testament prophets and given fuller expression in the New. This essay studies the reformers′ interpretation of the phrase logikē latreia at Romans 12:1, as well as other key passages. It concludes that, whether consciously or subconsciously, the reformers borrowed language concerning the material-spiritual dichotomy of worship, not directly from Neo-Platonists, but from a commonplace used by numerous Roman writers. Early Church Fathers had long ago turned the same commonplace against pagan rivals, but now the reformers were employing it against the Catholic Church itself.
Reference38 articles.
1. Attridge H (1978) The Philosophical Critique of Religion under the Early Empire. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.16.1: 45-78.
2. Bainton RH (1969) Erasmus of Christendom. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
3. Backus I (1980) The Reformed Roots of the English New Testament. The Influence of Theodore Beza on the English New Testament. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
4. Beza T (1598) Iesu Christi Domini nostri Novum Testamentum sive Novum Foedus, cuius Graeco contextui respondent interpretationes duae, una vetus; altera, Theodori Bezae; eiusdem Th. Bezae annotationes. Geneva: E. Vignon.
5. Bradbury S (1995) Julian’s Pagan Revival and the Decline of Blood Sacrifice. Phoenix 49(*): 331-356.