Use of a structured approach and virtual simulation practice to improve diagnostic reasoning

Author:

Dekhtyar Michael1ORCID,Park Yoon Soo2,Kalinyak Judy3,Chudgar Saumil M.4,Fedoriw Kelly Bossenbroek5,Johnson Khadeja J.6,Knoche Craig F.7,Martinez Lisa8,Mingioni Nina9,Pincavage Amber T.10,Salas Rachel11,Sanfilippo Fred12,Sozio Stephen M.13,Weigle Nancy14,Wood Sarah15,Zavodnick Jillian16,Stern Scott10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Education , University of Illinois , Chicago , IL , USA

2. Department of Health Professions Education Research , Harvard University , Boston , MA , USA

3. i-Human Patients, a Kaplan Company , Sunnyvale , CA , USA

4. Department of General Internal Medicine , Duke University School of Medicine , Durham , NC , USA

5. Department of Family Medicine , University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill , NC , USA

6. Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Education , Morehouse School of Medicine , Atlanta , GA , USA

7. i-Human Patients , Sunnyvale , CA , USA

8. Department of Integrated Medicine Science , Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine at Florida Atlantic University , Boca Raton , FL , USA

9. Department of Internal Medicine , Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University , Philadelphia , PA , USA

10. Department of Medicine , University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago , IL , USA

11. Department of Neurology and Nursing at Johns Hopkins Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA

12. Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine and Professor of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA

13. Department of Medicine and Epidemiology , Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA

14. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health , Duke University School of Medicine , Durham , NC , USA

15. Department of Medical Education , Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine at Florida Atlantic University , Boca Raton , FL , USA

16. Department of Medicine , Thomas Jefferson University , Philadelphia , USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives In 2015, the National Academy of Medicine IOM estimated that 12 million patients were misdiagnosed annually. This suggests that despite prolonged training in medical school and residency there remains a need to improve diagnostic reasoning education. This study evaluates a new approach. Methods A total of 285 medical students were enrolled in this 8 center, IRB approved trial. Students were randomized to receive training in either abdominal pain (AP) or loss of consciousness (LOC). Baseline diagnostic accuracy of the two different symptoms was assessed by completing a multiple-choice question (MCQ) examination and virtual patient encounters. Following a structured educational intervention, including a lecture on the diagnostic approach to that symptom and three virtual patient practice cases, each student was re-assessed. Results The change in diagnostic accuracy on virtual patient encounters was compared between (1) baseline and post intervention and (2) post intervention students trained in the prescribed symptom vs. the alternate symptom (controls). The completeness of the student’s differential diagnosis was also compared. Comparison of proportions were conducted using χ 2-tests. Mixed-effects regressions were used to examine differences accounting for case and repeated measures. Compared with baseline, both the AP and LOC groups had marked post-intervention improvements in obtaining a correct final diagnosis; a 27% absolute improvement in the AP group (p<0.001) and a 32% absolute improvement in the LOC group (p<0.001). Compared with controls (the groups trained in the alternate symptoms), the rate of correct diagnoses increased by 13% but was not statistically significant (p=0.132). The completeness and efficiency of the differential diagnoses increased by 16% (β=0.37, p<0.001) and 17% respectively (β=0.45, p<0.001). Conclusions The study showed that a virtual patient platform combined with a diagnostic reasoning framework could be used for education and diagnostic assessment and improved correct diagnosis compared with baseline performance in a simulated platform.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference18 articles.

1. National Academy of Sciences. Engineering, and medicine. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.

2. Stern, SDC, Cifu, AS, Altkorn, D. Symptom to diagnosis: an evidence-based guide, 4th ed. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill Education; 2020.

3. Paniagua, MA, Swygert, KA. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners; 2016.

4. Croskerry, P. From mindless to mindful practice-cognitive bias and clinical decision making. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2445–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1303712.

5. Newman-Toker, DE, Pronovost, PJ. Diagnostic errors-the next frontier for patient safety. J Am Med Assoc 2009;310:1060–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.249.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3