Diagnostic reasoning: relationships among expertise, accuracy, and ways that nurse practitioner students self-explain
Author:
Burt Leah1, Finnegan Lorna2, Schwartz Alan3, Corte Colleen1, Quinn Laurie1, Clark Lou4, Corbridge Susan1
Affiliation:
1. University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing , Chicago , IL , USA 2. Loyola University Chicago , Chicago , IL , USA 3. University of Illinois College of Medicine , Chicago , IL , USA 4. M Simulation , University of Minnesota , Minneapolis , MN , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To improve diagnostic ability, educators should employ multifocal strategies. One promising strategy is self-explanation, the purposeful technique of generating self-directed explanations during problem-solving. Students self-explain information in ways that range from simple restatements to multidimensional thoughts. Successful problem-solvers frequently use specific, high-quality self-explanation types. In a previous phase of research, unique ways that family nurse practitioner (NP) students self-explain during diagnostic reasoning were identified and described. This study aims to (a) explore relationships between ways of self-explaining and diagnostic accuracy levels and (b) compare differences between students of varying expertise in terms of ways of self-explaining and diagnostic accuracy levels. Identifying high-quality diagnostic reasoning self-explanation types may facilitate development of more refined self-explanation educational strategies.
Methods
Thirty-seven family NP students enrolled in the Doctor of Nursing Practice program at a large, Midwestern university diagnosed three written case studies while self-explaining. During the quantitative phase of a content analysis, associational and comparative data analysis techniques were applied.
Results
Expert students voiced significantly more clinical and biological inference self-explanations than did novice students. Diagnostic accuracy scores were significantly associated with biological inference scores. Clinical and biological inference scores accounted for 27% of the variance in diagnostic accuracy scores, with biological inference scores significantly influencing diagnostic accuracy scores.
Conclusions
Not only were biologically focused self-explanations associated with diagnostic accuracy, but also their spoken frequency influenced levels of diagnostic accuracy. Educational curricula should support students to view patient presentations in terms of underlying biology from the onset of their education.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference47 articles.
1. Newman-Toker, DE, Schaffer, AC, Yu-Moe, CW, Nassery, N, Saber Tehrani, AS, Clemens, GD, et al.. Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: the “Big Three” – vascular events, infections, and cancers. Diagnosis (Berl) 2019;6:227–40. 2. Saber Tehrani, AS, Lee, H, Mathews, SC, Shore, A, Makary, MA, Pronovost, PJ, et al.. 25-year summary of US malpractice claims for diagnostic errors 1986–2010: an analysis from the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:672–80. 3. Singh, H, Meyer, AN, Thomas, EJ. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:727–31. 4. Singh, H, Giardina, TD, Meyer, AN, Forjuoh, SN, Reis, MD, Thomas, EJ. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:418–25. 5. Sorinola, OO, Weerasinghe, C, Brown, R. Preventable hospital mortality: learning from retrospective case record review. JRSM Short Rep 2012;3:77.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|