Integrating infection and sepsis management through holistic early warning systems and heuristic approaches: a concept proposal
Author:
Tulli Giorgio1, Toccafondi Giulio2
Affiliation:
1. Regional Agency for Healthcare , Florence , Italy 2. Clinical Risk Management and Patient Safety Center – GRC , Florence , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
This is a first attempt to integrate the three pillars of infection management: the infection prevention and control (IPC), and surveillance (IPCS), antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), and rapid identification and management of sepsis (RIMS). The new ‘Sepsis-3’ definition extrapolates the diagnosis of sepsis from our previously slightly naïve concept of a stepwise evolving pattern. In doing so, however, we have placed the transition from infection toward sepsis in the domain of uncertainty and time-dependency. This now demands that clinical judgment be used in the risk stratification of patients with infection, and that pragmatic local solutions be used to prompt clinicians to evaluate formally for sepsis. We feel it is necessary to stimulate the development of a new generation of concepts and models aiming at embracing uncertainty. We see the opportunity for a heuristic approach focusing on the relevant clinical predictors at hand allowing to navigate the uncertainty of infection diagnosis under time constraints. The diverse and situated clinical approaches eventually emerging need to focus on the understanding of infection as the unbalanced interactions of host, pathogen, and environment. In order extend such approach throughout the patient journey we propose a holistic early warning system underpinned by the risk-based categories of hazards and vulnerabilities iteratively fostered by the information gathered by the infection prevention control and surveillance, clinical microbiology, and clinical chemistry services.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference52 articles.
1. Rhodes, A, Evans, LE, Alhazzani, W, Levy, MM, Antonelli, M, Ferrer, R, et al.. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2016. Crit Care Med 2017;45:486–552. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255. 2. Seymour, CW, Liu, VX, Iwashyna, TJ, Brunkhorst, FM, Rea, TD, Scherag, A, et al.. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis. JAMA 2016;315:762–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0288. 3. Kumar, A, Roberts, D, Wood, KE, Light, B, Parrillo, JE, Sharma, S, et al.. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1589–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000217961.75225.e9. 4. Singer, M, Deutschman, CS, Seymour, C, Shankar-Hari, M, Annane, D, Bauer, M, et al.. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:775–87. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287. 5. Fleischmann-Struzek, C, Mikolajetz, A, Schwarzkopf, D, Cohen, J, Hartog, CS, Pletz, M, et al.. Challenges in assessing the burden of sepsis and understanding the inequalities of sepsis outcomes between National Health Systems: secular trends in sepsis and infection incidence and mortality in Germany. Intensive Care Med 2018;44:1826–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5377-4.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|