Flipped learning in faculty development programs: opportunities for greater faculty engagement, self-learning, collaboration and discussion
Author:
Yılmaz Yusuf1ORCID, Çalışkan Süleyman Ayhan1ORCID, Darcan Şükran2ORCID, Darendeliler Feyza3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medical Education , Ege University Faculty of Medicine , Izmir , Turkey 2. Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine , Izmir , Turkey 3. Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine , Istanbul , Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of flipped learning in faculty development program (FDP) dedicated for developing key-feature questions (KFQs), and to compare examinees’ success and their opinions for the KFQs in a board exam.
Methods
The study group consisted of two cohorts – Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Society Board members (n=11) and Pediatric Endocrinology Subspecialty 2019 Board Examination examinees (n=22). We used flipped learning approach to develop KFQs. This entailed writing KFQs while learning took place online. The discussion and refinement of the questions for the exam were done during the face-to-face meeting. At the end, feedback was taken from both cohorts.
Results
The faculty members developed 14 KFQs during the flipped learning process. They found the training useful (Md=9, IQR=1), and expressed high satisfaction (Md=9, IQR=1) for flipped learning approach. According to the faculty members, peer review was an important step in the flipped learning instructions for revising and improving the KFQs.
Conclusions
A successful intervention of flipped learning approach has been tested in a FDP dedicated for KFQ writing. During flipped learning, the board (faculty) members were more engaged, motivated for self-learning and collaboration, and encouraged for robust face-to-face discussions.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry
Reference38 articles.
1. McLean, M, Cilliers, F, Wyk, JMV. Faculty development: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Med Teach 2008;30:555–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802109834. 2. Steinert, Y, Macdonald, ME, Boillat, M, Elizov, M, Meterissian, S, Razack, S, et al.. Faculty development: if you build it, they will come. Med Educ 2010;44:900–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03746.x. 3. Carlson, K, Ashford, A, Hegagi, M, Vokoun, C. Peer coaching as a faculty development tool: a mixed methods evaluation. J Grad Med Educ 2020. 4. Holmboe, ES, Ward, DS, Reznick, RK, Katsufrakis, PJ, Leslie, KM, Patel, VL, et al.. Faculty development in assessment: the missing link in competency-based medical education. Acad Med 2011;86:460–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31820cb2a7. 5. Sorinola, OO, Thistlethwaite, J, Davies, D, Peile, E. Faculty development for educators: a realist evaluation. Advances in health sciences and education. Netherlands: Springer; 2015, vol 20:385–401 pp.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|