The use of any with factive predicates

Author:

Duffley Patrick1,Larrivée Pierre2

Affiliation:

1. Département de langues, linguistique et traduction, Pavillon De Koninck, local 2289, 1030, avenue des Sciences-Humaines , Université Laval , Québec , QC G1V 0A6 , Canada

2. Département des Sciences du Langage , Université de Caen Normandie , Esplanade de la Paix, CS 14032 , 14032 Caen Cedex 5 , France

Abstract

Abstract While Negative Polarity Items are generally ungrammatical in veridical environments (*I said anything), they are known to be found in factive environments that involve veridicality (I regret you said anything). There is however disagreement in the literature about the types of factive environments in which any is found. This paper proposes the first systematic large-scale survey of the use of any with factive predicates. Based on corpora totaling nearly 5 billion words, the paper establishes the relative frequency of any licensed by the different factive predicates (epistemic factives, as well positive, negative and counterexpectative emotives). Negative emotive factives (e.g. regret) were found to license any 1.8 times more frequently than counterexpectative factives (be amazed), which license any 25.8 times more than do positive emotives (be glad). Emotive factives are associated with counterfactual preferences and expectations that make available a negative reading that licenses any. The examination of the data does not support a rescuing analysis that separates these occurrences of any from other licensed uses. On the contrary, the data show that any is licensed by at-issue meaning, as proposed by (Horn, Laurence. 2016. Licensing NPIs: Some negative (and positive) results. In Pierre Larrivée & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Negation and polarity. Experimental and cognitive perspectives, 281–305. Dordrecht: Springer.).

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference41 articles.

1. Aloni, Maria. 2007. Free choice, modals and imperatives. Natural Language Semantics 15. 65–94.

2. Atlas, Jay David. 1996. “Only” noun phrases, pseudo-negative generalized quantifiers, negative polarity items, and monotonicity. Journal of Semantics 13. 265–328.

3. Atlas, Jay David & Stephen C. Levinson. 1981. It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: Radical pragmatics. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 1–62. New York: Academic Press.

4. Baker, C. Lee. 1970. Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 169–186.

5. Brandtler, Johan. 2012. The evaluability hypothesis: The syntax, semantics and pragmatics of polarity item licensing. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pairing Degree-WH Clauses in Mandarin;Studies in Chinese Linguistics;2021-12-01

2. Processing of the Mandarin polarity item renhe ‘any’;Language and Linguistics / 語言暨語言學;2021-09-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3