Abstract
AbstractBased on the HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus, this study investigated the use of Chinese null arguments by advanced adult L1-English and L1-Japanese learners with Chinese native speakers as a baseline. Several asymmetries were found. First, the learners produced many more null subjects than null objects. Second, null subjects were mainly animate, while null objects were mainly inanimate. Third, more null subjects were used in non-matrix clauses than in matrix clauses. In addition, L1 did not seem to play a significant role in the learners’ use of Chinese null arguments, and the learners’ use Chinese null arguments was generally not native-like. Finally, it appears that null objects are not transferable or developmental and that infrequent use of null objects is universal in L2. It was argued that positive evidence in the target input as well as the nature of the subject and the object led to the asymmetric use of null subjects and null objects in L2 Chinese.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference108 articles.
1. The syntax of registers: Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root;Lingua,2013
2. The use of zero pronouns by nonnative speakers of Chinese and the implication for the acquisition of nominal reference;Studies in Second Language Acquisition,1995
3. Variation in subject pronominal expression in L2 Chinese;Studies in Second Language Acquisition,2014
4. Topic chain as a syntactic category in Chinese;Journal of Chinese Linguistics,1989
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献