CSG compressive strength prediction based on LSTM and interpretable machine learning
Author:
Tian Qingqing12, Gao Hang1, Guo Lei134, Li Zexuan1, Wang Qiongyao1
Affiliation:
1. North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power , Zhengzhou 450046 , China 2. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research , Beijing 100044 , China 3. Henan Water Conservancy Investment Group Co. , Ltd , Zhengzhou 450002 , China 4. Henan Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation and Treatment , Zhengzhou 450002 , China
Abstract
Abstract
As a new type of environmentally friendly building material, cemented sand and gravel (CSG) has advantages distinct from those of concrete. Compressive strength is an important mechanical property of CSG. However, his method of testing is mainly by doing experiments. For this reason, a deep learning algorithm, long short-term memory (LSTM) model, was proposed to predict the compressive strength of CSG by using four input variables, namely cement content, sand rate, water-binder ratio, and fly ash content, with a total of 114 sample data. Three metrics – coefficient (R
2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) – were used to evaluate the model’s performance, and the predicted results were compared with the traditional machine learning algorithm, namely the random forest (RF) model. Finally, SHapley Additive exPlanations can be combined to explain the contribution degree of each input feature in the machine learning inquiry model to the prediction results. The results show that the prediction accuracy and reliability of LSTM are higher. The LSTM model has R
2 = 0.9940, RMSE = 0.1248, and MAE = 0.0960, while the RF model has R
2 = 0.9147, RMSE = 0.4809, and MAE = 0.4397. The LSTM model can accurately predict CSG compressive strength. Cement and sand rate contribute more to the predicted results than other input characteristics.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Condensed Matter Physics,General Materials Science
Reference41 articles.
1. Jia, J., M. Lino, F. Jin, and C. Zheng. The cemented material dam: a new, environmentally friendly type of dam. Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2016, pp. 490–497. 2. Huang, H., K. Huang, X. C. Zhang, and L. W. Han. Hysteresis and damping effect of cemented sand and gravel material under cyclic loading. Journal of Building Materials, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2018, pp. 739–748. 3. Jiang, M., X. Cai, X. Guo, Q. Liu, and T. Zhang. Adiabatic temperature rise test of cemented sand and gravel (CSG) and its application to temperature stress prediction of CSG dam. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 2020, 2020, pp. 1–12. 4. Sun, M. Q., L. Guo, S. F. Yang, Q. H. Chai, S. K. Chen, L. W. Han, et al. Study on mechanical properties, durability and dam type of cement-sand-gravel materials. Beijing: China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Publishing House; 2016. 5. Du, W. T., Q. C. Wang, J. P. Dai, B. Zhang, R. S. Bi, and H. Cao. Study on compressive strength of concrete under the action of multiple factors. Concrete, Vol. 396, No. 10, 2022, pp. 43–4651.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|