Affiliation:
1. Harvard University and The GovLab, Harvard , USA
Abstract
Abstract
One of the most urgent debates of our time is about the exact role that new technologies can and should play in our societies and particularly in our public decision-making processes. This paper is a first attempt to introduce the idea of CrowdLaw, defined as online public participation leveraging new technologies to tap into diverse sources of information, judgments and expertise at each stage of the law and policymaking cycle to improve the quality as well as the legitimacy of the resulting laws and policies. First, we explain why CrowdLaw differs from many previous forms of political participation. Second,we reproduce and explain the CrowdLaw Manifesto that the rising CrowdLaw community has elaborated to foster such approaches around the world. Lastly, we introduce some preliminary considerations on the notions of justice, legitimacy and quality of lawmaking and public decision-making, which are central to the idea of CrowdLaw.
Subject
Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science
Reference3 articles.
1. Reply to Habermas in of The Cost - Benefit State : The Future of Regulatory Protection Chicago Infotopia How Many Minds Produce Knowledge Oxford Simpler The Future of Government New York Wiser Getting beyond Grougthink to Make Groups Smarter La Vergne;Rawls;Journal Philosophy,1995
2. The Logic of Connective Action in : Information Communication and eds Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents National and Post - national Challenges London;Bennett;Society,2012
3. The Democratic Disconnect in of Saving Democracy From Ourselves : Democracy as a Tragedy of the Commons Harvard University;Foa;Journal Democracy,2016
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献