Affiliation:
1. Department of International Relations , South Asian University , New Delhi , India
Abstract
Abstract
The United Nations Human Development Report (UNHDR) mentions that the rights of women and female children are inalienable, integral and indivisible. It further highlights the full and equal participation of women in every segment of the social process without any discrimination or without considering sex - gender hierarchies.1 The legal frameworks of the international system and local political space is accepting of the normative values of gender equality and the eradication of gender-based discrimination. But most of the majoritarian societies challenge these legal frameworks to address their political, social and market-oriented interests. These actions are driven by political, social and structural frameworks which have been accepted by the majoritarian societies in the liberal democratic world.
Tamil women in upcountry tea plantations in Sri Lanka were subjected to systemic and structural violence because of Sinhala majoritarian statecrafts in post-independence Sri Lanka. The ethnocentric violence directly problematises human security, survival and the personal rights of the upcountry Tamil female labour force. This paper discusses the survival of Tamil female plantation labour forces, focusing mainly on the security crisis of female reproductive rights under the ethnocentric Sinhala Majoritarian Society.
Reference14 articles.
1. Appadurai, Arjun. Fear of Small Numbers. Landon: Duke University Press, 2006.
2. Balasundaram, Sasikumar, “Sterilization Abuses and Women’s Reproductive Health in Sri Lanka’s Tea Plantation.” Indian Anthropologist 41, no. (2011): 57-78.
3. Bass, Daniel. “Paper Tigers on the Prowl: Rumours, Violence, and Agency in the Up-Country of Sri Lanka.” Anthropological Quarterly 81, no. 1 (2008) 269-295.
4. Chandrabose, A. S. “Outgoing Labour and It’s Impact on the Tea Plantation Sector in Sri Lanka.” Intersym5 (2005): 412-421.
5. Denemark, Robert A. “Toward a Theory of Ethnic Violence.” Humbolt Journal of Social Relations 20, no 2 (1995): 95-120.