Affiliation:
1. University of California Literature Department 9500 Gilman Drive, 0410, La Jolla San Diego USA
Abstract
Abstract
In this article I explore a selection of texts from Greece and Mesopotamia that either recount or comment on the succession myth. I argue that representations of violence in those texts differ considerably within the same culture and time period. I explain these variations as social deixis, positing that ancient authors and interpreters of the succession myth used different representations of violence to present themselves as innovative figures. I argue that both mythmakers and myth-interpreters increased and decreased the intensity and number of violent features to mark a position in the competitive field of cosmological knowledge. Through the comparison of the sources, I show that there was as much competition and innovation in Greece as in Mesopotamia within the field of cosmology. The similarity of social contexts and practices may explain the cross-cultural transfer of knowledge between specialists of these two regions.
Reference129 articles.
1. Abusch, T. (1999), “Marduk”, in: K. van der Toorn/B. Becking/P.W. van der Horst (eds.), Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, Leiden, 543–549.
2. Archi, A. (2004), “Translation of Gods: Kumarpi, Enlil, Dagan/NISABA, Ḫalki”, in: Orientalia 73, 319–336.
3. Archi, A. (2009), “Orality, Direct Speech and the Kumarbi Cycle”, in: AF 36, 209–229.
4. Athanassaki, L. (2009), “Narratology, Deixis, and the Performance of Choral Lyric: on Pindar’s «First Pythian Ode»”, in: Narratology and Interpretation: the Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature, Berlin, 241–273.
5. Ayali-Darshan, N. (2015), “The Other Version of the Story of the Storm-god’s Combat with the Sea in the Light of Egyptian, Ugaritic, and Hurro-Hittite Texts”, in: JANER 15, 20–51.