The influence of rheology in the fabrication of ceramic-based scaffold for bone tissue engineering
Author:
Bagwan Jameer K.1ORCID, Ahuja Bharatkumar B.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Industrial Management, College of Engineering Pune , Pune , Maharashtra , India
Abstract
Abstract
Bone tissue is the second most affected organ in the human body after blood. Tissue engineering is the area whereby a scaffold is used to regenerate the lost bone. However, the scaffold’s effectiveness is primarily based on the material and the fabrication process. The patient-specific structures are affected because of the fabrication process used to fabricate the scaffold as per requirement. In this regard, rheology plays an important role in the fabrication of the patient-specific scaffold, and it is a study of the flow of ink. This primarily affects both the conventional as well as the non-conventional fabrication processes. In this paper, the scaffold and bone tissue engineering, the different fabrication processes, and the importance of the rheological characterization are presented. In addition to this, the rheological properties of the developed HA/β-TCP composite slurry are evaluated for the extrusion-based additive manufacturing process. The developed ink’s rheological properties show that the flow behavior index of about 0.0497 ± 0.009, minimum flow stress required to make the ink flow of about 51.076 Pa at a strain rate of 0.111 %, and shape retention upto 75 % after 175 s are obtained. Also, different orientations are 3D printed using the developed slurry.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Metals and Alloys,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Condensed Matter Physics
Reference58 articles.
1. Bagde, A. D., Kuthe, A. M., Quazi, S., Gupta, V., Jaiswal, S., Jyothilal, S., Lande, N., Nagdeve, S. IRBM 2019, 40, 133; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2019.03.001. 2. Turnbull, G., Clarke, J., PicardRiches, F. P., Jia, L., Han, F., Li, B., Shu, W. Bioact. Mater. 2018, 3, 278; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001. 3. Guzzi, E. A., Bovone, G., Tibbitt, M. W. Small 2019, 15, 1; https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201905421. 4. Maas, M., Hess, U., Rezwan, K. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 19, 585; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2014.09.002. 5. Schwab, A., Levato, R., D’Este, M., Piluso, S., Eglin, D., Malda, J. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 11028; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084.
|
|