Affiliation:
1. University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Abstract
Abstract
Since c. 2008 many special collections libraries have allowed researchers to take photographs of medieval manuscripts: this article calls such self-service photography ‘DIY digitization’. The article considers some possible effects of this digital tool for research on book history, especially on palaeography, comparing it in particular to the effects of institutionally-led digitization. ‘DIY digitization’ does assist with access to manuscripts, but less easily and with less open data than institutional digitization does. Instead, it allows the researcher’s intellectual agenda to guide the selection of what to photograph. The photographic process thereby becomes part of the process of analysis. Photography by the researcher is therefore limited by subjectivity but it also helps to highlight the role of subjective perspectives in scholarship. It can also balance a breadth or depth of perspective in ways different from institutional digitization. It could in theory foster increased textual scholarship but in practice has fostered attention to the materiality of the text.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference54 articles.
1. Albritton, Benjamin, Georgia Henley and Elaine Treharne (eds.). 2020. Medieval Manuscripts in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.
2. Altschuler, Sari and David Weimer. 2020. “Texturing the Digital Humanities: A Manifesto”. PMLA 135: 74–91.
3. Anon. 2015. “Photography in the Manuscripts Reading Room”. On the blog British Library: Medieval Manuscripts. 19 March. [accessed 31 May 2020].
4. Baron, Naomi. 2015. Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Beeby, Andrew, Richard Gameson and Catherine Nicholson. 2018. “New Light on Old Illuminations”. Archives and Records 39: 244–256.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献