Affiliation:
1. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Philosophisches Seminar, Platz der Universität 3, 79085 Freiburg, Tel. +49 761 203-2430;
Abstract
Abstract
Against the still prevalent assumption according to which Kant’s moral philosophy does not, at least for sensuous rational agents, provide a satisfactory answer to the problem posed by their need of happiness, the present paper develops the following argument: The subject must be able to interrupt her pursuit of happiness - precisely in order not to game away her happiness. Within the horizon of Kant’s doctrine of moral incentives as well as in a secular reading of his conception of the highest good, one can see, first, that the possibility of a morally motivated interruption of the pursuit of happiness is a necessary condition precisely for the happiness of finite but rational agents; second, that sensuous satisfaction must be understood as an integrative component of the highest good and, as such, as a second necessary condition for happiness. Kant’s notion of the highest good, thus, conceptualizes the coincidence of virtue and lust as a sufficient condition of happiness, by which a morally mediated lust becomes possible that not only provides sensuous satisfaction, but also makes us happy.
Reference4 articles.
1. Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant in Journal of the History of;Reath;Philosophy,1988
2. In Defense of Kant s Doctrine of the Highest Good in;Barnes;Philosophical Forum,1972
3. Gold Kant s Ethical Commonwealth : The Highest Good as Social Goal in;Anderson;International Philosophical Quarterly,1986
4. The Unimportance of the Highest Good in of the History of Philosophy;Auxter;Journal,1979