John Stuart Mills liberaler Marktsozialismus: bisheriges Scheitern und bleibende Relevanz

Author:

Neuhäuser Christian1

Affiliation:

1. Technische Universität Dortmund, Institut für Philosophie und Politikwissenschaft , Emil-Figge-Straße 50, 44227 , Dortmund , Germany

Abstract

Abstract John Stuart Mill had strong sympathies with a liberal form of market socialism based on worker-owned and worker-managed firms. He thought that only very few government interventions were needed to trigger a peaceful and spontaneous transition to such an economic system. This article recapitulates his thesis and argument by focusing on his major work Principles of Political Economy, which is rather neglected by philosophers, especially in the German-speaking world. I will argue that Mill was too optimistic in his hope for a spontaneous transition without government intervention. Since it is possible to reconstruct how Mill thought this transition would proceed, it is also possible to identify at what point the transition did not advance in the way envisioned by him, but was blocked by antagonistic forces. I will argue that this insight is not only of historical value, but still poses a serious problem for John Rawls’s theory of justice. Rawls follows Mill closely in his discussion of the proper economic system and he faces the same problem of transition.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Philosophy

Reference67 articles.

1. Acemoglu, D., u. Robinson, J. (2013), Warum Nationen scheitern: Die Ursprünge von Macht, Wohlstand und Armut, Frankfurt am Main.

2. Arneson, R. (1987), Meaningful work and market socialism, in: Ethics 97.2, 517–545.

3. Baum, B. (1999), J. S. Mill’s Conception of Economic Freedom, in: History of Political Thought 20, 494–530.

4. Baum, B. (2007), John Stuart Mill and Liberal Socialism, in: Urbinati, N. (Hg.), John Stuart Mill’s Political Thought, Cambridge, 98–124.

5. Beckert, J. (2013), Erben in der Leistungsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Wirtschaftsethik;Handbuch Technikethik;2021

2. Unternehmen;Handbuch Wirtschaftsphilosophie III;2021

3. Unternehmen;Praktische Wirtschaftsphilosophie;2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3