Author:
Woerdman Edwin,Nentjes Andries
Abstract
Abstract
We argue that the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) has evolved into a hybrid of two design variants, allowance trading (cap-and-trade) and credit trading (performance standard rate trading), with an added feature of industry support to minimize carbon leakage. In particular the current rules tying free allowances to production capacity expansion, plant closure and capacity use have transformed the efficient cap-and-trade program that stood at the origins of the EU ETS into a system that even surpasses credit trading in paying hidden product subsidies to firms. This combination of rules encourages an inefficiently high level of investment in production capacity and an inefficiently high output in industries exposed to international competition. The result is a sub-optimal EU Emissions Trading ‘Hybrid’ (which we therefore label as ‘EU ETH’).
Subject
Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference59 articles.
1. Emissions Trading: ERCs or Allowances?;Land Economics,2001
2. New Entrant and Closure Provisions: How Do They Distort?;29 The Energy Journal (Special Issue on Campbell Watkins),2008
3. Paying for Pollution: Permits and Charges;Scandinavian Journal of Economics,1996
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献