Affiliation:
1. University of Minnesota , Twin Cities, 262 Nicholson Hall , 216 Pillsbury Dr. SE, Minneapolis , MN United States of America 5635 University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Abstract
Abstract
Triumphal policing in the 60 s and 50 s BCE was unusually intense. During this period, nearly all triumphatores were forced to wait for years ad urbem (outside the pomerium) while their petitions were obstructed by their opponents, a trend that certainly contributed to an historically low rate of processions (an average of around one every three years). No figure appears as frequently in our evidence for triumphal policing and obstruction in the late Republic as Cato the Younger. Whereas scholarship has previously discussed his triumphal interventions through familiar (and problematic) lenses (e. g., Cato the “arch-conservative,” Cato the “political nemesis of Caesar,” Cato the “unrealistic citizen of Plato’s Republic”), this piece offers a new reading of Cato’s letter on the topic (Fam. 15.5), contending that Cato’s interest in the triumph was motivated by his anxiety over the use of military achievement to legitimize aristocratic political power. When read correctly and in context, Cato’s beliefs and actions regarding the triumph were revisionist, not conservative; ideological, not personal; and genuinely interested in bringing about tangible change in Roman political culture.
Reference112 articles.
1. Afzelius, A. “Die politische Bedeutung des jüngeren Catos.” C&M 4 (1941): 100–203.
2. Alexander, M. Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto, 1990
3. Arena, V. and J. Prag, editors. A Companion to the Political Culture of the Roman Republic. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2022.
4. Badian, E. Roman Imperialism in the Late Republic, Second Ed. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1968.
5. Badian, E. “Additional notes on Roman magistrates.” Athenaeum 48 (1970): 3–14.