Association between clinical variations and copy number variations in cases with Turner syndrome
Author:
Aksoy Ezgi1, Cogulu Ozgur2, Pariltay Erhan2, Ozen Samim3, Ata Aysun3, Karaca Emin2, Darcan Sukran3
Affiliation:
1. Department of Child Health and Diseases , Faculty of Medicine, Ege University , Izmir , Turkey 2. Department of Medical Genetics , Faculty of Medicine, Ege University , Izmir , Turkey 3. Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes , Faculty of Medicine, Ege University , Izmir , Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Turner syndrome (TS) is one of the most common chromosomal abnormalities with an incidence of approximately one in 2,500 live births. Short stature and primary ovarian insufficiency are two most important characteristic findings of TS. Turner syndrome karyotypes include monosomy X, mosaic structure and X chromosome structural anomalies. Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics vary among cases. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical variations observed in TS cases with the copy number variations (CNV) detected by microarray study.
Methods
Fifty-three patients diagnosed with TS, between the ages of 0–18 were included in the study. Peripheral blood samples were taken from 36 cases for microarray study.
Results
Karyotypes were as follows: thirty-three of cases were 45,X, 7 were 45,X/46,XX, 6 were 45,X/46,Xi(Xq), 2 were 46,Xi(Xq), 2 were 45,X/46,r(X), 1 was 45,X/46,Xi(Xp), 1 was 45,X/46,XY and 1 was 45,X/46,X+mar(idicY) karyotype. A significant correlation was found between karyotype groups and FSH values of the cases (p=0.034). In monosomy X and mosaic isochromosome Xq cases, the FSH value was found to be significantly higher than those with 45,X/46,XX mosaic karyotype. CNVs were found in 8 (22.2%) out of 36 cases whose microarray study was performed. Unexpected atypical findings were discussed in the light of the characteristics of CNVs.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the microarray method has a great contribution in explaining many unexpected findings in TS cases. Moreover, those CNV findings may contribute for the explanation of the underlying mechanisms of those anomalies.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference24 articles.
1. Wolff, DJ, Van Dyke, DL, Powell, CM. Laboratory guideline for Turner syndrome. Genet Med [Internet] 2010;12:52–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/gim.0b013e3181c684b2. 2. Nussbaum, RL, McInnes, RR, Willard, HF, Thompson, MW, Hamosh, A. Thompson & Thompson genetics in medicine, 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2007:585 p. 3. Gürsoy, S, Erçal, D. Turner syndrome and its variants. J Pediatr Res [Internet] 2017;4:171–5. https://doi.org/10.4274/jpr.35744. 4. Sybert, VP, McCauley, E. Turner’s syndrome. N Engl J Med [Internet] 2004;351:1227–38. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra030360. 5. Van Dyke, DL, Wiktor, A, Paliner, CG, Miller, DA, Witt, M, Babu, VR, et al.. Ullrich-Turner syndrome with a small ring X chromosome and presence of mental retardation. Am J Med Genet [Internet] 1992;43:996–1005. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320430617.
|
|