Adiposity measures in screening for metabolic syndrome among Chinese children and adolescents
Author:
Tang Zhaoxie1, Yang Chen2, Zheng Hao1, Jing Jiajia1, Li Xiuhong1, Zhu Yanna1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Maternal and Child Health and Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute , School of Public Health and Institute of State Governance, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China 2. Physical Examination Center , The Eastern Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Existing various and complicated metabolic syndrome (MetS) definitions have contributed to the difficulty in assessing MetS in children and adolescents, and therefore it is urgently needed to develop a convenient and effective screening tool for pediatric MetS. This study aimed to identify the optimal adiposity measure to screen for pediatric MetS.
Methods
The cross-sectional data was collected from 8,150 children and adolescents aged 7–17 y living in southern China. Anthropometric indices, blood lipids, and serum glucose were determined. Results of two commonly used MetS definitions were compared: International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel Ⅲ (NCEP-ATP) modified by Cook. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed and areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to determine the optimal index for MetS screening.
Results
MetS prevalence assessed by NCEP-ATP was significantly higher than that by IDF (6.2% vs. 1.5%, p<0.001). Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) showed the highest screening power for MetS defined by both IDF and NCEP-ATP (AUC 0.932 and 0.900, respectively), and its optimal cut-off point was 0.48 by both IDF and NCEP-ATP definition (sensitivity 0.944 and 0.847, specificity 0.800 and 0.830, respectively), regardless of age or sex. When taking sex diversity into account, the optimal WHtR cut-off point was 0.49 (IDF) or 0.50 (NCEP-ATP) in boys, and 0.46 (both definitions) in girls.
Conclusions
Among children and adolescents aged 7–17 y in southern China, a WHtR greater than 0.48 can be a simple but effective screening tool for MetS.
Funder
Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in SYSU
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference38 articles.
1. O’Neill, S, O’Driscoll, L. Metabolic syndrome: a closer look at the growing epidemic and its associated pathologies. Obes Rev 2015;16:1–12, https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12229. 2. Magge, SN, Goodman, E, Armstrong, SC. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents: shifting the focus to cardiometabolic risk factor clustering. Pediatrics 2017;140:e20171603, https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1603. 3. Steinberger, J, Daniels, SR, Eckel, RH, Hayman, L, Lustig, RH, McCrindle, B, et al.. Progress and challenges in metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents: a scientific statement from the American heart association atherosclerosis, hypertension, and obesity in the young committee of the council on cardiovascular disease in the young; council on cardiovascular nursing; and council on nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism. Circulation 2009;119:628–47, https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.191394. 4. Mameli, C, Zuccotti, GV, Carnovale, C, Galli, E, Nannini, P, Cervia, D, et al.. An update on the assessment and management of metabolic syndrome, a growing medical emergency in paediatric populations. Pharmacol Res 2017;119:99–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2017.01.017. 5. Friend, A, Craig, L, Turner, S. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in children: a systematic review of the literature. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2013;11:71–80, https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2012.0122.
|
|