“Dignity Embodies Duty”: Islamic Perspective on Combating “Hate Speech”

Author:

Malik Bilal Ahmad1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center of Central Asian Studies , University of Kashmir , Srinagar , India

Abstract

Abstract Hate speech (‘al-jahr bi’-sūʾ min al-qawl in the Qur’anic description) continues to be the subject of contentious debate. Arguably, the notion of “unregulated speech” in the liberal discourse encourages hate speech on the pretext of “defending” the right to freedom of speech. Islam recognises human dignity as the underlying basis of all human rights and freedoms, including the right to freedom of speech. Here arise two core questions. First, is freedom of speech and expression an absolute right or has Islam imposed certain conditions on the human agency while this right is exercised? Second, what do these conditions concerning freedom of speech imply about the regulation of hate speech? I approach these questions by beginning with the introduction of karamah principle followed by an overview of theoretical conceptualisations of free speech in the Western context. Finally, the Islamic position on the subject is brought forth through the conceptual analysis of relevant Islamic texts. The article draws three conclusions. First, human dignity is the intrinsic condition that surpasses all rights and freedoms. Second, the idea of “unregulated speech” is controversial and has been a reason for harming human dignity and making the public discourse inimical to social order. Third, there should be a legal, moral and rational reconciliation between exercising ‘speech limitations’ and ‘free speech’ to ensure sustainable peace and social cohesion.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference48 articles.

1. Al-Alwani, T. J. 2012. Apostasy in Islam: A Historical and Scriptural Analysis. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.

2. Al-Eili, A. H. 1983. Al-Hurrayat Al-Ammah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr Al-Arabi.

3. Ali, A. Y. 1946. The Holy Qur’an: Translation and Commentary. Birmingham: Islamic Propagation Centre International.

4. Badamchi, D. K. 2014. “Justifications of Freedom of Speech: Towards a Double-Grounded Non-consequentialist Approach.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 11 (9): 907–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453714564457.

5. Baily, D. H. 1964. Public Liberties. Chicago: Rand, McNally.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3