Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science , Justus Liebig University Giessen , Giessen , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Departing from a critical norm research perspective, the paper first sketches the need to unveil the Eurocentric and secular bias of International Relations (IR) as a discipline in general and its constructivist norm research program in particular. With regard to human rights norms, and religious freedom in particular, the dominant liberal-secular international human rights law understanding of religious freedom marginalizes religious, and especially, Islamic grounds and understandings of this truly global norm. Indeed, it demonstrates both, the dominant ideational perspective of religious freedom as a Western human right grounded by Western-canonical thinkers, and the limits of accommodating religion and religious voices in IR. In contrast, and against the background of a post-secular IR, the paper seeks to unveil alternative and marginalized bodies of Islamic knowledge for the sake of a more comprehensive picture to be painted by IR. By reconstructing reformist Islamic thought and Islamic ideational perspectives and conceptualizations of religious freedom, the paper seeks to let these voices speak for themselves as truly genuine Islamic contributions to IR. The overall aim is threefold: to theoretically connect critical norm research and post-secular approaches with reformist Islamic thought by conceptualizing ijtihad as religious norm contestation; to unveil the double marginalized character of critical Muslim voices in IR; and finally to paint a broader and more comprehensive picture of Islam and IR by revealing an alternative Islamic genealogy of universal religious freedom.
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference41 articles.
1. Acharya, Amitav. 2004. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58 (2): 239–275.
2. Acharya, Amitav. 2011. “Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (1): 95–123.
3. Alalwani, Taha Jabir. 2012. Apostasy in Islam: A Historical and Scriptural Analysis. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
4. An-Na’im, Abdullahi A. 2009. “A Theory of Islam, State and Society.” In New Directions in Islamic Thought: Exploring Reform and Muslim Tradition, edited by K. Vogt, L. Larsen and C. Moe, 145–161. London: I. B. Tauris.
5. Badri, Farhood. 2016. “Religious Freedom - IR and Islamic Perspectives on a Globally Contested Norm.” Paper presented at the 3rd European Workshops in International Studies, Tübingen, April 6–8, 2016.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献