Affiliation:
1. Department of English, French, and German Philology, University of Oviedo , Principality of Asturias , Spain
2. Department of Linguistics and English Language, University of Manchester , Manchester , UK
Abstract
Abstract
The paper argues for a bisentential, paratactic account of Hanging Topic Left Dislocations wherein the syntactically unconnected hanging topic phrase is the remnant of an elliptical copulative sentence which is linearly juxtaposed to the second, host sentence. This proposal represents a natural extension of Ott’s system for Clitic Left Dislocations and predicative non-restrictive nominal appositives. By assuming that the hanging topic is structurally disconnected from the host sentence, the analysis constitutes a radical departure from integrated/monosentential approaches within cartography, which analyze hanging topics as intrasentential, albeit peripheral, constituents in the left spine of the clause. Using data from English and Spanish as well as from other linguistic varieties, the paratactic approach provides a principled account of various issues facing monosentential analyses of hanging topics, including anti-connectivity, coreference with the resumptive/epithetic correlate, comma intonation/pause potential, case, insensitivity to locality constraints, islandhood, and potential presence of interjections between hanging topic and host sentence, amongst others. The account is also successful in capturing orphaned topics, which are not linked to any constituent in the sentence they occur with, alongside ‘interrogative’ and hyperdetached hanging topics.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference71 articles.
1. Acuña Fariña, Juan Carlos. 1995. Left-dislocation revisited. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 8. 7–23. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.1995.8.01.
2. Aitchison, Jean. 2012. Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental Lexicon. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Anagnostopoulou, Elena, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts. 1997. Materials on left dislocation. Amsterdam & Philadephila: John Benjamins.
4. Arregi, Karlos. 2003. Clitic Left Dislocation is contrastive topicalization. In Proceedings of the 26th annual Penn linguistics Colloquium, Penn working papers in linguistics, vol. 9.1, 31–44. Philadelphia: Penn Linguistics Club.
5. Avgustinova, Tania. 1994. On Bulgarian verbal clitics. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 2(1). 29–47.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献