Affiliation:
1. Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation , University of Bonn , Nussallee 17, 53115 Bonn , Germany
2. TUM School of Engineering and Design , Technical University of Munich, Chair of Engineering Geodesy, Arcisstra ß e 21 , 80333 Munich , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Performing deformation analyses with high accuracy demands using terrestrial laser scanners is very challenging due to insufficient knowledge about the error budget and correlations. Terrestrial laser scans suffer from random and systematic errors that degrade the quality of the point cloud. Even though the vast majority of systematic errors can be calibrated, remaining errors or errors that vary with time or temperature influence spatially neighboring points in the same way. Hence, correlations between the measurements exist. Considering area-based deformation analyses, these correlations have two effects: On the one hand, they reduce the effective number of measurements in the point cloud, which mainly influences the decision of whether the movement is significant or not. On the other hand, correlations caused by systematic errors in the scanner can lead to a misinterpretation as a deformation of the object. Within this study, we analyze the deformation of a concrete wall (9.50 m height, 50 m width), and we develop a workflow that avoids the misinterpretation of correlated measurements as deformations of the object. Therefore, we first calibrate the scanner to reduce the influence of systematic errors. Afterwards, we use the average of two-face measurements from several scanner stations to eliminate remaining systematic errors and correlated measurements. This study demonstrates that systematic effects can lead to errors of a few millimeters that are likely to be interpreted as small deformations, and it provides a strategy to avoid misinterpretation. Hence, it is inevitable either to model or to eliminate systematic errors of the scanner while performing a precise deformation analysis with a magnitude of a few millimeters.
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Engineering (miscellaneous),Modeling and Simulation
Reference26 articles.
1. Lindenbergh, R, Pietrzyk, P. Change detection and deformation analysis using static and mobile laser scanning. Appl Geomatics 2015;7:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-014-0151-y.
2. Mukupa, W, Roberts, GW, Hancock, CM, Al-Manasir, K. A review of the use of terrestrial laser scanning application for change detection and deformation monitoring of structures. Surv Rev 2017;49:99–116.
3. Soudarissanane, S, Lindenbergh, R, Menenti, M, Teunissen, P. Scanning geometry: influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens 2011;66:389–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.01.005.
4. Lichti, DD. Error modelling, calibration and analysis of an AM-CW terrestrial laser scanner system. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens 2007;61:307–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.10.004.
5. Medić, T, Kuhlmann, H, Holst, C. A priori vs. in-situ terrestrial laser scanner calibration in the context of the instability of calibration parameters. In: Contributions to international conferences on engineering surveying, INGEO & SIG 2020. Dubrovnik, Croatia; 2021.