International Students’ Experience of Remote Teaching and Learning in Portugal
Author:
Aguiar Joyce1, Sin Cristina2, Tavares Orlanda2
Affiliation:
1. Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies , Matosinhos , Portugal 2. CeiED - Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Education and Development, Lusófona University , Lisbon , Portugal
Abstract
Abstract
This article analyzes international students’ assessment of remote teaching and learning (T&L) during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal. While all students have suffered the consequences of campus lockdowns and distance teaching, international students represent a particularly vulnerable group since, even under normal circumstances, they already have to deal with the challenges of new academic and living conditions. In Portugal, most international students come from Portuguese-speaking (designated as Lusophone) countries. Students’ experiences were gathered via an online cross-sectional survey (N = 672), and the quantitative analysis compared Lusophone and non-Lusophone students and undergraduate and postgraduate students. Non-Lusophone students were more negative about remote education than Lusophone ones, being less interested in continuing to study online and giving a more negative assessment of the T&L experience than their counterparts. For them, cultural immersion is probably as important as degree attainment. Postgraduate students reported a lesser increase in study time and rated the pedagogical aspects better than undergraduate students, which suggests, by comparison, a better adaptation to the remote regime. Implementing flexible and hybrid education solutions is critical to maintaining international students’ interest.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference51 articles.
1. American Psychological Association. (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). 2. Baggaley, J. (2020). Educational distancing. Distance Education, 41(4), 582–588. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2020.1821609. 3. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3878572. 4. Bruggeman, B., Garone, A., Struyen, K., Pynoo, B., & Tondeau, J. (2022). Exploring university teachers’ online education during COVID-19: Tensions between enthusiasm and stress. Computers and Education Open, 3(22), 100095. doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100095. 5. Cairns, D., França, T., Calvo, D. M., & de Azevedo, L. (2021). An immobility turn? The Covid-19 pandemic, mobility capital and international students in Portugal. Mobilities, 16(6), 874–887. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2021.1967094
|
|