Affiliation:
1. Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic
Abstract
Abstract
A study was carried out in Central Bohemia to understand the effect of row spacing and stand density on plant morphology, productivity and quality of silage maize in two row spacing treatments (0.70 m and 0.35 m) at two stand densities (92,000 plants/ha and 110,000 plants/ha). The results of the study showed that row spacing and stand density had no effect on plant height or weight; however, significantly higher ear ratio and dry matter content was found in narrow rows at 110,000 plants/ha. It was observed that plant morphology was affected more by the interaction between row spacing and stand density than by a single effect of tested factors. Significantly higher dry matter yield was recorded at higher stand density, but there was no row spacing × stand density interaction. Row spacing had no impact on the whole plant neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content, crude protein of stover and starch content of ear, while narrow rows resulted in almost significantly higher stover NDF content. Our results suggest that narrow rows could be advantageous for maize morphology and quality in cases where higher stand density is applied.
Subject
Horticulture,Plant Science,Soil Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference30 articles.
1. ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS. 2005. Official methods of analysis, 18th Ed. Gaithersburg, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC International.
2. BAGHDADI, A. – HALIM, R.A. – MAJIDIAN, M. – DAUD, W.N.W. – AHMAD, I. 2012. Plant density and tillage effects on forage corn quality. In Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 10 no. 2, pp. 366–370.
3. BALKCOM, K.S. – SATTERWHITE, J.L. – ARRIAGA, F.J. – PRICE, A.J. – VAN SANTEN, E. 2011. Conventional and glyphosate-resistant maize yields across plant densities in single- and twin-row configurations. In Field Crops Research, 120, no. 3, pp. 330‒337. 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.10.013
4. BARBIERI, P. – ECHARTE, L. – DELLA MAGGIORA, A. – SADRAS, V.O. – ECHEVERRIA, H. – ANDRADE, F.H. 2012. Maize evapotranspiration and water-use efficiency in response to row spacing. In Agronomy Journal, 104 no. 4, pp. 939–944. 10.2134/agronj2012.0014
5. BARON, V.S. – NAJDA, H.G. – STEVENSON, F.C. 2006. Influence of population density, row spacing and hybrid on forage corn yield and nutritive value in a cool-season environment. In Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86 no. 4, pp. 1131–1138. 10.4141/P05-136