Affiliation:
1. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
Abstract
AbstractPeirce aspired for the completeness of his logic cum the theory of signs in his 1903 Lowell Lectures and other late manuscripts. Semeiotic completeness states that everything that is a consequence in logical critic is derivable in speculative grammar. The present paper exposes the reasons why Peirce would fall short of establishing semeiotic completeness and thus why he would not continue seeking a perfect match between the theories of grammar and critic. Some alternative notions are then proposed.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference54 articles.
1. New light on Peirce’s conceptions of retroduction, deduction, and scientific reasoning;International Studies in the Philosophy of Science,2014
2. How to justify deductive reasoning: Peirce’s solution;British Journal for the History of Philosophy,forthcoming
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Peirce’s Dragon-Head Logic (R 501, 1901);Archive for History of Exact Sciences;2022-02-24
2. Phaneroscopy and Theory of Signs as Theory of Cognition;Peirce and Husserl: Mutual Insights on Logic, Mathematics and Cognition;2019