Affiliation:
1. Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA15213USA
Abstract
AbstractThis study aimed to investigate: (1) Chinese heritage learners’ (CHLs) pragmatic competence in comparison to foreign language learners of Chinese (CFLs) and (2) the relationship between CHLs’ pragmatic competence and their language contact in a range of social settings. Focal linguistic forms included sentence final particles (SFPs) and formulaic expressions (FORs). Sixty Chinese language learners in the intermediate- and advanced-level classes (31 CHLs and 29 CFLs) participated in the study. Participants completed a computerized listening comprehension task, a written production task, and a language contact questionnaire. Findings showed that CHLs outperformed CFLs in both comprehension and production of Chinese sentence final particles and formulaic expressions. The analysis of language contact questionnaire revealed that learners who reported a greater amount of interactive language contact achieved higher scores on the pragmatic tasks, regardless of the constructs and skill domains assessed.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Education
Reference74 articles.
1. Toward a definition of heritage language: Sociopolitical and pedagogical considerations;Journal of Language, Identity, and Education,2003
2. Sociopragmatics in language teaching: With examples of Chinese requests;Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,1997
3. The power of cuteness: Female infantilization in urban Taiwan;The Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs,2005
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献