Do learners use different topical progression patterns in L2 Chinese argumentative spoken and written discourse?

Author:

Liao Jianling1

Affiliation:

1. School of International Letters & Cultures , Arizona State University , PO Box 870202 , Tempe , AZ 85287-0202 , USA

Abstract

Abstract The current study examines how L2 Chinese learners develop their topics in spoken and written discourse. Currently, researchers have mainly analyzed topical progression features in written texts. Topical progression in speech is rarely examined. We know little about whether learners may advance their topics differently in spoken and written discourse. The current study investigates how advanced Chinese learners apply topical progressions, such as parallel or sequential progression, in argumentative spoken and written discourse, respectively. The study also examines how various topical progressions may relate to the holistic qualities of spoken and written discourse. Topical progression features were analyzed using the Topical Structure Analysis framework. The results showed significant differences in the use of new sequential and related sequential progressions between the two types of discourse. The case study analysis results revealed a multi-Z and single-Z topical movement pattern for higher-score and lower-score performances, respectively.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Education

Reference38 articles.

1. ACTFL. 2012. ACTFL proficiency guidelines. https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/guidelines/ACTFLProficiencyGuidelines2012.pdf (accessed 1 December 2022).

2. Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9. 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001.

3. Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Kornwipa Poonpon. 2011. Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45. 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483.

4. Burneikaitė, Nida & Jurgita Zabiliūtė. 2003. Information structuring in learner texts: A possible relationship between the topical structure and the holistic evaluation of learner essays. Studies about Language 4. 67–72.

5. Chan, Wing Sat. 2018. The text coherence of four bilingual writing tasks in “topical structure analysis”. In Conference proceedings of Oxford conference series, 74–84. Livingston: FLE Learning.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3