Affiliation:
1. University Library of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark
2. LIBER, National Library of the Netherlands , NL-2509 The Hague , The Netherlands
3. Center for Science Studies, Aarhus University , Ny Munkegade 118, DK-8000 Aarhus C , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Citizen science is spreading and numerous centres, services, or “hubs” within the field are manifesting themselves at European universities. Research libraries can potentially play a central role in advancing citizen science and open science. Building on a scoping literature review, a survey with 125 respondents, and an in-depth follow-up survey of 29 research libraries as part of the Citizen-enhanced Open Science in Southeastern Europe Higher Education Knowledge Hubs (CeOS_SE) project, this article outlines the current state and potential of citizen-enhanced open science (CE-OS) among European research libraries and presents a series of strategic and operational reflections for the future. Overall, research libraries report a high degree of understanding of both open science and citizen science and their applicability for society and research, but only few report the presence of services or infrastructure. Also, approximately half of the libraries engage in, or experiment with, citizen science. Common barriers exist such as resources, funding, strategy, and lack of policy. From these data, we present a typology to better understand how research libraries currently engage with citizen science and the steps that have been taken in this field. However, the overarching conclusion is that CE-OS with regards to European research libraries is contextual. There is no one size fits all.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference28 articles.
1. Agergaard, T. E., Kragh, G., & Nielsen, K. H. (2020). Citizen Science i Danmark. Projekter, litteratur og aktører [Citizen Science in Denmark. Projects, literature, and actors]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
2. Ansell, M., Tennant, M. R., Piazza, V., & Cottler, L. B. (2017). Piloting consumer health information services in collaboration with a community research engagement program. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 36(4), 348–361. 10.1080/02763869.2017.1369283.
3. Ayris, P., & Ignat, T. (2018). Defining the role of libraries in the Open Science landscape: A reflection on current European practice. Open Science Information, 2, 1–22. 10.1515/opis-2018-0001.
4. Bettany-Saltikov, J. (2016). How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: A step-by-step guide (2nd ed.). London: McGraw Hill Open University Press.
5. Danish e-infrastructure Cooperation. (2020). FAIR for beginners. https://www.deic.dk/en/data-management/instructions-and-guides/FAIR-for-Beginners.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献