Air contamination, syringe contamination, and cross-contamination when using an automatic compounding device for sensitizing drugs
Author:
Sessink Paul1, Cajaraville Gerardo2, Tamés Maria José2, Riestra Ana2, Alcorta Andrea3, Telleria Naiara3, Grisaleña Jaione3
Affiliation:
1. Exposure Control Sweden AB , Bohus-Björkö , Västra Götaland , Sweden 2. Department of Pharmacy , Onkologikoa Foundation Hospital , San Sebastian , Spain 3. Kiro Grifols S.L. , Arrasate , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To measure cross-contamination between batches of different sensitizing drugs, contamination on the outside of compounded syringes, and drug concentrations in environmental air when using an automated compounding device.
Methods
One batch of piperacillin/tazobactam syringes followed by one batch of meropenem syringes were compounded daily for three consecutive days by one operator. For each batch two hundred syringes were filled. During each batch, three stationary air samples (two inside and one outside the compounding device), and one personal air sample were collected. At the end of the compounding process, the outside of 40 syringes was tested for drug contamination by wipe sampling. The drug compounded was checked for cross-contamination with the other drug compounded in the previous batch. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was used for the analysis of piperacillin and meropenem.
Results
Piperacillin was measured in environmental air inside the device (8.1–335 ng/m3), outside the device (5.2–21 ng/m3), and in the personal air samples of the operator (15 and 155 ng/m3) during two batches. Meropenem was not detected during meropenem compounding. Piperacillin was found in the air samples of the operator during two batches (12 and 15 ng/m3). Meropenem was not detected in any of the air samples. The drug compounded was found on the outside of the syringes for all batches (piperacillin: 1.35–30 ng/cm2; meropenem: 0.07–0.65 ng/cm2). Piperacillin was detected on the syringes in all meropenen batches (0.56–11 ng/cm2), and meropenen in two piperacillin batches (0.07 and 0.46 ng/cm2). The drug solutions show no cross-contamination with the other drug for any of the batches.
Conclusions
Cross-contamination was not found and the drug concentrations in environmental air were below the Occupational Exposure Limit of 0.1 mg/m3. The automatic compounding device meets the criteria for a safe compounding of sensitizing drugs for patient and operator.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,Pharmacy
Reference22 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA. Antibiotic use in the United States: progress and opportunities. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2017. 2. Stenton, SC, Dennis, JH, Hendrick, DJ. Occupational asthma due to ceftazidime. Eur Respir J 1995;8:1421–3. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.95.08081421. 3. Gielen, K, Goossens, A. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from drugs in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 2001;45:273–9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450504.x. 4. Cetinkaya, F, Ozturk, AO, Kutluk, G, Erdem, E. Penicillin sensitivity among hospital nurses without a history of penicillin allergy. J Adv Nurs 2007;58:126–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04155.x. 5. Kim, JE, Kim, SH, Jin, HJ, Hwang, EK, Kim, JH, Ye, YM, et al.. IgE sensitization to cephalosporins in health care workers. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2012;4:85–91. https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2012.4.2.85.
|
|