Continuity or Change? Leaders’ Values in the Baltic Countries over Time-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Continuity or Change? Leaders’ Values in the Baltic Countries over Time

Published:2020-12-01 Issue:1 Volume:84 Page:95-112
ISSN:2335-8750
Container-title:Management of Organizations: Systematic Research
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Stelmokienė Aurelija¹,Kravčenko Karina²

Affiliation:

1. PhD, assoc. professor, Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences , Vytautas Magnus University , Lithuania. Address: Jonavos str. 66-328 , Kaunas , Lithuania . Phone: +370 37 327 824.

2. PhD student at the Faculty of Social Sciences , Vytautas Magnus University , Lithuania. Address: Jonavos str. 66-328 , Kaunas , Lithuania . Phone: +370 37 327 824.

Abstract

Abstract Both scientists and practitioners acknowledge leadership as a key predictor of success in organizations. Leaders’ values could be a significant criterion for the analysis of changes in leadership recently. This study aims to investigate changes in leaders’ values over time among Baltic countries. The results of the European Social Survey (ESS) showed that leaders’ values did not significantly change over time (from 2008 to 2016). However, the expression of values significantly differed between leaders of different countries.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.1515/mosr-2020-0015

Reference45 articles.

1. 1. Aidukaitė, J. (2013). Social Policy Changes in the three Baltic States over the Last Decade (2000–2012) // Ekonomika. Vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 89–104. doi: 10.1080/01629778.2019.157095810.1080/01629778.2019.1570958

2. 2. Allen, P., Bennett, K. (2008). SPSS for the Health & Behavioural Sciences. – South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Thomson.

3. 3. Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A., Buckley, M. R. (2017). What Works for You May Not Work For (Gen) Me: Limitations of Present Leadership Theories for the New Generation // The Leadership Quarterly. Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 245–260. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.00110.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.001

4. 4. Archer, S. (2013). Leadership Development– Can there be a Return on Investment? // Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 18–21. doi: 10.1108/1477728131131586510.1108/14777281311315865

5. 5. Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F., Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions // Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 60, pp. 421–449. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.16362110.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621