Affiliation:
1. University of Luzern Chair of Philosophy, Faculty of Theology Frohburgstrasse 3, Postfach 4466, 6002 Luzern Schweiz
Abstract
Abstract
In the eleventh book of the Confessiones Augustine puts forward several considerations about the nature of time. The received view is that he held that only the present exists, while the past and the future do not exist. This received view has recently been attacked by Paul Helm and Katherin Rogers, who have offered alternative interpretations according to which Augustine held that the present has no privileged ontological status, and that past, present and future all equally exist. The aim of this paper is to defend the received view vis-à-vis these attacks. I argue that the received view fits best Augustine’s view of God’s eternity and relation to time and should therefore be preferred.
Reference35 articles.
1. Bettetini, M. 2001 “Measuring in Accordance with dimensiones certae. Augustine of Hippo and the Question of Time”. In The Medieval Concept of Time: Studies on the Scholastic Debate and its Reception in Early Modern Philosophy. Ed. P. Porro. Leiden, 33–53.
2. Berti, E. 2007. In principio era la meraviglia: le grandi questioni della filosofia antica. Roma/Bari.
3. Brown, P. 2000. Augustine of Hyppo: A Biography (update of 1967 edition). Berkeley.
4. Carter, J. W. 2011. “St. Augustine on Time, Time Numbers, and Enduring Objects”. Vivarium 49(4), 301–323. doi: 10.1163/156853411X606374.
5. Costa, D. 2017. “The Limit Decision Problem and Four-Dimensionalism”. Vivarium 55(1–3), 199–216.