Affiliation:
1. Lingnan University, PhilosophyTuen Mun (New Territories)Tuen Mun (New Territories), Hong Kong, SAR,
Abstract
Abstract:The reduplication argument advanced by Bernard Williams in 1956 has greatly stimulated the contemporary debate on personal identity. The argument relies on a famous thought experiment that, although not new in the history of philosophy, has engaged some of the most influential contemporary philosophers on the topic. I propose here an interpretation of the argument and a reconstruction of the early reception that Williams’ paper had in the 6 years immediately after its publication. The works discussed include papers by C. B. Martin, G. C. Nerlich, R. Coburn, and J. M. Shorter.
Reference56 articles.
1. “On Evidence for Identity”;Australasian Journal of Philosophy,1959
2. “Opposite Number”;The Review of Metaphysics,1957
3. “Persons and Their Pasts”;American Philosophical Quarterly,1970
4. “Locke on Personal Identity”;Philosophy,1978
5. “Memory and Personal Identity”;Australasian Journal of Philosophy,1964