Affiliation:
1. Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Philosophisches Seminar Bursagasse 1, D-72070 Tübingen Germany
Abstract
Abstract
The article discusses the accusation advanced by Plutarch and Cicero, according to which the Epicureans are unjust, as they would break the law to pursue pleasure if certain of impunity, and deals with this criticism by analyzing the Epicurean theory of law and justice and comparing it with friendship. The article argues that, from a doctrinal standpoint, philia has a higher place in the Epicurean’s priorities and a stronger efficacy than positive law in serving the naturally just. It thus concludes that, as Plutarch and Cicero suspected, the Epicurean’s ultimate loyalty does not lie with positive law, in spite of its importance for social order, but rather with the naturally just (dikaion), better secured by friendship.
Reference53 articles.
1. Ando, C. 2000. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London.
2. Annas, J. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. New York-Oxford.
3. Armstrong, J. M. 1997. “Epicurean Justice”. Phronesis 42, 324–34.
4. Arrighetti, G. 1973. Epicuro. Opere. Turin.
5. Bailey, C. 1926. Epicurus: The Extant Remains. Oxford.