Effects of a full-body electrostimulation garment application in a cohort of subjects with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and stroke on upper motor neuron syndrome symptoms
Author:
Hahn Andreas1ORCID, Moeller Susan2, Schlausch Arne3, Ekmann Matilda4, de Chelle Gautier5, Westerlund Marie4, Braatz Frank6, Mayr Winfried7
Affiliation:
1. Ottobock Healthcare Products GmbH , Vienna , Austria 2. Academy , Otto Bock HealthCare Deutschland GmbH , Duderstadt , Germany 3. Clinical Research & Services Otto Bock HealthCare Deutschland GmbH , Duderstadt , Germany 4. Clinical Research , Exoneural Network AB , Danderyd , Sweden 5. Médecin MPR Centre de Santé ROSSETTI , Nice , France 6. Private Hochschule Göttingen , Göttingen , Germany 7. Medical University Vienna , Vienna , Austria
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Dysfunction of the central nervous system may inflict spastic movement disorder (SMD). Electrical stimuli were identified as promising therapeutic option. Electrical stimulation provided by a 58-electrode full body garment was investigated based on data from regular trial fittings.
Methods
Data from 72 testees were investigated. Age averages 36.6 (19.8) ys with 44 females. The cohort spans infantile cerebral paresis (CP) (n=29), multiple sclerosis (MS) (n=23) and stroke (n=20). Data were stratified by etiology and an entry BBS Score<45.
Results
Effect sizes (Cohen`s d) related BBS, TUG, FGA, 10mWT, WMFT, EQ5D5L and Pain. Significance levels are indicated by *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001, (t): p<0.1: CP: 1.64***, 0.29*, 1.59***, 0.76(t), 1.00***, 0.5*, 1.28***; MS: 1.83***, 0.83***, 1.28**, 1.07***, 0.93*, 1,11**, 0.78*; Stroke: 1.28**, 0.78**, 0.89, 0.92**, 0.71, 1.26*, 0.78*.
Conclusions
Multi-site transcutaneous electrical stimulation may increase ambulation related skills in subjects with SMD stemming from CP, MS and stroke. The results indicate effects on static and dynamic balance, fall risk, mobility, upper extremity improvement and an overall increase in health utility and a reduction in spasticity related pain. Effects are immediate as well as sustained. These results may inspire individual trial fittings and inform further controlled trials.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biomedical Engineering
Reference35 articles.
1. Trompetto, C, Marinelli, I, Mori, L, Pelosin, E, Currà, A, Molfetta, L, et al.. Pathophysiology of spasticity: implications for neurorehabilitation. BioMed Res Int 2014;2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/354906. 2. Mukherjee, A, Chakravarty, A. Spasticity mechanisms – for the clinician. Front Neurol 2010;1:149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2010.00149. 3. Nielsen, JB, Christensen, MS, Farmer, SF, Lorentzen, J. Spastic movement disorder: should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement? Exp Brain Res 2020;238:1627–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05792. 4. Chang, E, Ghosh, N, Yanni, D, Lee, S, Alexandru, D, Mozaffar, T. A review of spasticity treatments: pharmacological and interventional approaches. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 2013;25:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.2013007945. 5. Mahmood, A, Veluswamy, SK, Hombali, A, Mullick, A, Manikandan, N, Solomon, JM, et al.. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on spasticity in adults with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2018;97:793–807. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000970.
|
|