Impact of the new European medical device regulation: a two-year comparison

Author:

Carl Ann-Kathrin1ORCID,Hochmann David1

Affiliation:

1. Biomechatronics Research Laboratory , FH Münster University of Applied Sciences , Steinfurt , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Objectives In recent years, the European Union has revised its regulatory framework for medical devices, primarily to improve patient safety and public health. The Medical Device Regulation (MDR) is fully applicable since May 2021, strengthening the requirements for all stakeholders. As a result, many companies are facing enormous challenges. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the MDR on the orthopaedic aids industry. Methods Two surveys were conducted: one shortly before the MDR became applicable (146 respondents) and a second survey almost two years later (233 respondents). Results Both surveys revealed that all businesses in the orthopaedic aids sector, regardless of size, have difficulty implementing the MDR. Key challenges include additional workload for technical documentation, increased resource expenditure and cost, and lack of clarity regarding the new requirements. Many companies are downsizing their product portfolio, resulting in potential supply shortages and a loss of competitive advantage and innovation for the medical device industry in Europe. Conclusions The full extent of the MDR’s impact on clinical practice is still unclear. However, many companies lack the necessary resources. The MDR can potentially be a bottleneck in the availability of medical devices.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biomedical Engineering

Reference19 articles.

1. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices and amending Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulations (EC) No 178/2002 and (EC) No 1223/2009’. C 133/52; 2013. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52012AE2185 [Accessed 12 May 2023].

2. Greco, C. The poly implant prothèse breast prostheses scandal: embodied risk and social suffering. Soc Sci Med 2015;147:150–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.068.

3. Cohen, D. Faulty hip implant shows up failings of EU regulation. BMJ 2012;345:e7163. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7163.

4. Heneghan, C, Aronson, JK, Goldacre, B, Mahtani, KR, Plüddemann, A, Onakpoya, I. Transvaginal mesh failure: lessons for regulation of implantable devices. BMJ 2017;359:j5515. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j5515.

5. Types of legislation. https://european-union.europa.eu/institutions-law-budget/law/types-legislation_en [Accessed 12 May 2023].

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3